Why Constructive Conservation Dialogue Matters
- Lion Landscapes

- Oct 28, 2024
- 2 min read
At Lion Landscapes, we believe that real progress in conservation comes from thoughtful, evidence-based discussions. This belief has been central to our work, whether we’re supporting communities in coexisting with wildlife or addressing the complexities of human-carnivore conflict. Recently, our joint CEO, Professor Amy Dickman, tackled an increasingly important issue in her latest article: how online hostility and personal attacks can derail meaningful conservation discussions and hinder the search for real solutions.
In her piece, Amy highlights how polarising debates, particularly around controversial topics like trophy hunting, can quickly turn toxic when hate speech takes centre stage. Instead of fostering a space for open dialogue, conversations often shut down due to anger and personal attacks. This is harmful not only to conservation but also to the communities and wildlife we work to protect. Constructive conversations, rooted in facts and respect for different viewpoints, are essential to finding solutions that benefit both people and wildlife. Amy’s response calls for more of this – for creating spaces where debate can flourish without devolving into hostility.
This blog post builds on our earlier piece, Courage and Complexity in Conservation, where we explored the bravery it takes to stand up for difficult conversations. Conservation, by its very nature, is filled with tough choices, competing priorities, and ethical challenges. It’s easy to be swept away by oversimplified narratives, but true progress comes from acknowledging and working through complexity. As Amy points out, these aren’t easy conversations, but they are necessary.
By sharing Amy’s article, we hope to encourage a broader discussion on how we can engage in more productive, respectful conservation dialogue. The challenges we face as a conservation organisation – from managing human-wildlife conflict to ensuring the sustainability of ecosystems – are far too important to let them be derailed by online hostility. Now, more than ever, it’s crucial that we remain focused on evidence-based, solution-oriented discussions.
As we continue our work at Lion Landscapes, we invite others to join us in promoting respectful and constructive conservation conversations. Whether you agree or disagree on specific approaches, the ultimate goal is to protect wildlife, support communities, and foster coexistence between people and nature. Let’s ensure that the focus remains on what really matters.
Read Amy’s full article "Online hate hinders nuanced conservation debates — a call for a better way forward".
Stay in touch
You can visit our website and keep up to date on our work and research in Africa by subscribing to our general newsletter. Join us on Facebook, Instagram, X and LinkedIn for recent photos and stories from the field.
.png)

A profound and useful message! Wildlife conservation is complicated and requires evidence-based discussion, not online rants. Like the game monkey mart, operating a produce supermarket requires composure, smart planning, and the ability to tackle tiny concerns one by one to run well. Civility and a multifaceted worldview underpin successful environmental protection in the actual world!
People who follow my blog can enjoy a mixture of practical guidance and personal observations. This article maintained a friendly style from beginning to end. The examples made the information feel more relevant. I liked how the author avoided exaggerated statements. The final paragraph connected all the ideas smoothly. Thank you for preparing such useful content.
The practical tips in this post are suitable for readers with different levels of experience. The author explains the basics while also including more advanced suggestions. I liked the emphasis on steady improvement. The examples helped me understand how the advice can be adapted. The article remained focused throughout. I will return to it when needed.
Such a fascinating topic, and one that clearly benefits from someone who's actually taken the time to research it properly. The author connected ideas in ways that made the whole subject feel more coherent than usual. That coherence made following along easy despite the topic's inherent complexity. Anyone wanting to learn more should find this a solid place to begin. Thanks for such a well-researched and coherent piece.
Most of the angry, dissenting voices, are from those who have no experience of life in the bush, of wildlife, or the struggle for existence. They seem to think that cats are like their pets, elies are ‘cute’, wise and so could never be aggressive. They do not understand the environment of drought, searing heat, starvation, and the fight for survival of both Man and beast.